Social Capital (Key Ideas)

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online Social Capital (Key Ideas) file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with Social Capital (Key Ideas) book. Happy reading Social Capital (Key Ideas) Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF Social Capital (Key Ideas) at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF Social Capital (Key Ideas) Pocket Guide.

One might claim this capacity contributed to a transposition of social capital theory within public discourse. The limitations of finance as the central engine of economic growth, the material hardships fostered by the crisis, and the austerity measures implemented by governments in response to these challenges are critically undermining the legitimacy of neoliberal policies Ferragina and Arrigoni A number of authors [24] [99] [] [] give definitions of civil society that refer to voluntary associations and organisations outside the market and state.

This definition is very close to that of the third sector, which consists of "private organisations that are formed and sustained by groups of people acting voluntarily and without seeking personal profit to provide benefits for themselves or for others". These voluntary associations also connect people with each other, build trust and reciprocity through informal, loosely structured associations, and consolidate society through altruism without obligation.

It is "this range of activities, services and associations produced by If civil society, then, is taken to be synonymous with the third sector then the question it seems is not 'how important is social capital to the production of a civil society? The idea that creating social capital i. The goal is to reintegrate those marginalised from the rewards of the economic system into "the community". However, according to Onyx , while the explicit aim of this policy is inclusion, its effects are exclusionary. Foley and Edwards [] believe that "political systems The resurgence of interest in social capital as a remedy for the cause of today's social problems draws directly on the assumption that these problems lie in the weakening of civil society.

However this ignores the arguments of many theorists who believe that social capital leads to exclusion [ citation needed ] rather than to a stronger civil society. In international development, Ben Fine and John Harriss have been heavily critical of the inappropriate adoption of social capital as a supposed panacea promoting civil society organisations and NGOs, for example, as agents of development for the inequalities generated by neo liberal economic development. An abundance of social capital is seen as being almost a necessary condition for modern liberal democracy.

A low level of social capital leads to an excessively rigid and unresponsive political system and high levels of corruption, in the political system and in the region as a whole. Formal public institutions require social capital in order to function properly, and while it is possible to have too much social capital resulting in rapid changes and excessive regulation , it is decidedly worse to have too little. This article found that in post-communist states, higher levels of social capital did not equate to higher levels of democracy. However, higher levels of social capital led to higher support for democracy.

A number of intellectuals in developing countries have argued that the idea of social capital, particularly when connected to certain ideas about civil society, is deeply implicated in contemporary modes of donor and NGO driven imperialism and that it functions, primarily, to blame the poor for their condition. The concept of social capital in a Chinese social context has been closely linked with the concept of guanxi.

An interesting attempt to measure social capital spearheaded by Corporate Alliance [] in the English speaking market segment of the United States of America and Xentrum [] through the Latin American Chamber of Commerce [] in Utah on the Spanish speaking population of the same country, involves the quantity, quality and strength of an individual social capital.

With the assistance of software applications and web-based relationship-oriented systems such as LinkedIn , these kinds of organizations are expected to provide its members with a way to keep track of the number of their relationships, meetings designed to boost the strength of each relationship using group dynamics, executive retreats and networking events as well as training in how to reach out to higher circles of influential people.

Social Capital - John Field - Google Книги

There are many factors that drive volume towards the ballot box, including education, employment, civil skills, and time. Careful evaluation of these fundamental factors often suggests that women do not vote at similar levels as men. However the gap between women and men voter turnout is diminishing and in some cases women are becoming more prevalent at the ballot box than their male counterparts.

Recent research [] on social capital is now serving as an explanation for this change. Social capital offers a wealth of resources and networks that facilitate political engagement. Since social capital is readily available no matter the type of community, it is able to override more traditional queues for political engagement; e. There are unique ways in which women organize. These differences from men make social capital more personable and impressionable to women audiences thus creating a stronger presence in regards to political engagement.

A few examples of these characteristics are:. The often informal nature of female social capital allows women to politicize apolitical environments without conforming to masculine standards, thus keeping this activity at a low public profile.

Social capital

These differences are hard to recognize within the discourse of political engagement and may explain why social capital has not been considered as a tool for female political engagement until as of late. A growing body of research has found that the presence of social capital through social networks and communities has a protective quality on health. Social capital affects health risk behavior in the sense that individuals who are embedded in a network or community rich in support, social trust, information, and norms, have resources that help achieve health goals. Social capital also encourages social trust and membership.

These factors can discourage individuals from engaging in risky health behaviors such as smoking and binge drinking. Inversely, a lack of social capital can impair health. For example, results from a survey given to to year-old students in Sweden showed that low social capital and low social trust are associated with higher rates of psychosomatic symptoms, musculoskeletal pain, and depression. Although there are only a few studies that assess social capital in criminalized populations, there is information that suggests that social capital does have a negative effect in broken communities.

Deviant behavior is encouraged by deviant peers via favorable definitions and learning opportunities provided by network-based norms. Similar to watching the news and keeping abreast of current events, the use of the Internet can relate to an individual's level of social capital. In one study, informational uses of the Internet correlated positively with an individual's production of social capital, and social-recreational uses were negatively correlated higher levels of these uses correlated with lower levels of social capital.

He created it after an incident where a lady passed out during a train ride due to the congestion in the train and help was delayed because of the congestion in the train and the inefficiency of the train conductor. His blog exposed the poor conditions of train stations, overcrowding train rides and inefficiency of the train conductor which eventually influenced changes within the transit system.

Unlike face to face interaction, people can instantly connect with others in a targeted fashion by placing specific parameters with internet use. This means that individuals can selectively connect with others based on ascertained interests, and backgrounds. Facebook is currently the most popular social networking site and touts many advantages to its users including serving as a social lubricant for individuals who otherwise have difficulties forming and maintaining both strong and weak ties with others.

This argument continues, although the preponderance of evidence shows a positive association between social capital and the internet. Critics of virtual communities believe that the Internet replaces our strong bonds with online "weak-ties" [] or with socially empty interactions with the technology itself. Recent research, conducted in , also shows that Internet users often have wider networks than those who uses internet irregularly or not at all.

When not considering family and work contacts, Internet users actually tend to have contact with a higher number of friends and relatives. Other research shows that younger people use the Internet as a supplemental medium for communication, rather than letting the Internet communication replace face-to-face contact. Among respondents of this study, social capital built exclusively online creates weaker ties. Coleman and Hoffer collected quantitative data of 28, students in total 1, public, Catholic and other private high schools in America from the 7 years' period from to They criticise Coleman, who used only the number of parents present in the family, neglected the unseen effect of more discrete dimensions such as stepparents' and different types of single-parent families.

They take into account of a detailed counting of family structure, not only with two biological parents or stepparent families, but also with types of single-parent families with each other mother-only, father-only, never-married, and other. They also contribute to the literature by measuring parent-child interaction by the indicators of how often parents and children discuss school-related activities. Morgan and Sorensen [] directly challenge Coleman for his lacking of an explicit mechanism to explain why Catholic schools students perform better than public school students on standardised tests of achievement.

One is on Catholic schools as norm-enforcing schools whereas another is on public schools as horizon-expanding schools. It is found that while social capital can bring about positive effect of maintaining an encompassing functional community in norm-enforcing schools, it also brings about the negative consequence of excessive monitoring.

Creativity and exceptional achievement would be repressed as a result. Whereas in horizon expanding school, social closure is found to be negative for student's mathematic achievement.

December 31, 2011

These schools explore a different type of social capital, such as information about opportunities in the extended social networks of parents and other adults. The consequence is that more learning is fostered than norm-enforcing Catholic school students. In sum, Morgan and Sorensen's study implies that social capital is contextualised, one kind of social capital may be positive in this setting but is not necessarily still positive in another setting.

In the setting of education through Kilpatrick et al. Social capital is particularly important in terms of education. Also the importance of education with ' Without social capital in the area of education, teachers and parents that play a responsibility in a students learning, the significant impacts on their child's academic learning can rely on these factors.

With focus on parents contributing to their child's academic progress as well as being influenced by social capital in education. Without the contribution by the parent in their child's education, gives parents less opportunity and participation in the student's life. As Tedin et al. With parents also involved in activities and meetings the school conducts, the more involved parents are with other parents and the staff members. Thus parent involvement contributes to social capital with becoming more involved in the school community and participating makes the school a sustainable and easy to run community.

In their journal article "Beyond social capital: Spatial dynamics of collective efficacy for children", Sampson et al. They claim, "resources or networks alone e. Marjoribanks and Kwok [] conducted a survey in Hong Kong secondary schools with fourteen-year-old students with an aim to analyse female and male adolescents differential educational achievement by using social capital as the main analytic tool. In that research, social capital is approved of its different effects upon different genders.

Adaptation and School Performance", Hei Hang Hayes Tang argues that adaptation is a process of activation and accumulation of cultural and social capitals. The research findings show that supportive networks is the key determinant differentiating the divergent adaptation pathways.

Supportive networks, as a form of social capital, is necessary for activating the cultural capital the newly arrived students possessed. The amount of accumulated capital is also relevant to further advancement in the ongoing adaptation process. Min Zhou and Carl L. Bankston [] in their study of a Vietnamese community in New Orleans find that preserving traditional ethnic values enable immigrants to integrate socially and to maintain solidarity in an ethnic community.

Ethnic solidarity is especially important in the context where immigrants just arrive in the host society. In her article "Social Capital in Chinatown", Zhou examines how the process of adaptation of young Chinese Americans is affected by tangible forms of social relations between the community, immigrant families, and the younger generations. Ethnic support provides impetus to academic success. Furthermore, maintenance of literacy in native language also provides a form of social capital that contributes positively to academic achievement.

Stanton-Salazar and Dornbusch [] found that bilingual students were more likely to obtain the necessary forms of institutional support to advance their school performance and their life chances. Putnam mentions in his book Bowling Alone , " Child development is powerfully shaped by social capital" and continues "presence of social capital has been linked to various positive outcomes, particularly in education".

In states where there is a high social capital, there is also a high education performance. Teachers have reported that when the parents participate more in their children's education and school life, it lowers levels of misbehavior, such as bringing weapons to school, engaging in physical violence, unauthorized absence, and being generally apathetic about education.

In order to understand social capital as a subject in geography, one must look at it in a sense of space, place, and territory. In its relationship, the tenets [ who? The biggest advocate for seeing social capital as a geographical subject was American economist and political scientist Robert Putnam. His main argument for classifying social capital as a geographical concept is that the relationships of people is shaped and molded by the areas in which they live.

Putnam argued that the lack of social capital in the South of Italy was more the product of a peculiar historical and geographical development than the consequence of a set of contemporary socio-economic conditions. This idea has sparked a lengthy debate and received fierce criticism Ferragina, ; Ferragina Anthony Giddens developed a theory in in which he relates social structures and the actions that they produce.

In his studies, he does not look at the individual participants of these structures, but how the structures and the social connections that stem from them are diffused over space. If an area is plagued by social organizations whose goals are to revolt against social norms, such as gangs, it can cause a negative social capital for the area causing those who disagreed with said organizations to relocate thus taking their positive social capital to a different space than the negative.

  1. Abstract: Social Capital (Key Ideas) (Collaborative Thinking)?
  2. .
  3. The Dukes Agent.
  4. Social capital - Wikipedia;
  5. Navigation menu!
  6. Proxima?

Another area where social capital can be seen as an area of study in geography is through the analysis of participation in volunteerism and its support of different governments. One area to look into with this is through those who participate in social organizations. People that participate are of different races, ages, and economic status. Secondly, there are different social programs for different areas based on economic situation. Thirdly, social capital can be affected by the participation of individuals of a certain area based on the type of institutions that are placed there.

Fox in his paper "Decentralization and Rural Development in Mexico", which states "structures of local governance in turn influence the capacity of grassroots communities to influence social investments. Since every area is different, the government takes that into consideration and will provide different areas with different institutions to fit their needs thus there will be different changes in social capital in different areas.

In the context of leisure studies , social capital is seen as the consequence of investment in and cultivation of social relationships allowing an individual access to resources that would otherwise be unavailable to him or her. There is a significant connection between leisure and democratic social capital. The more an individual participates in social activities, the more autonomy the individual experiences, which will help her or his individual abilities and skills to develop.

The greater the accumulation of social capital a person experiences, may transfer to other leisure activities as well as personal social roles, relationships and in other roles within a social structure. It has been noted that social capital may not always be used for positive ends. While pursuing doctoral studies, Lester was the first to create figures and equate negative social capital with negative returns.

An example of the complexities of the effects of negative social capital is violence or criminal gang activity that is encouraged through the strengthening of intra-group relationships bonding social capital. Without "bridging" social capital, "bonding" groups can become isolated and disenfranchised from the rest of society and, most importantly, from groups with which bridging must occur in order to denote an "increase" in social capital. Bonding social capital is a necessary antecedent for the development of the more powerful form of bridging social capital.

As social capital bonds and stronger homogeneous groups form, the likelihood of bridging social capital is attenuated. Bonding social capital can also perpetuate sentiments of a certain group, allowing for the bonding of certain individuals together upon a common radical ideal. The strengthening of insular ties can lead to a variety of effects such as ethnic marginalization or social isolation. In extreme cases ethnic cleansing may result if the relationship between different groups is so strongly negative.

In mild cases, it just isolates certain communities such as suburbs of cities because of the bonding social capital and the fact that people in these communities spend so much time away from places that build bridging social capital. Social capital in the institutional Robert Putnam sense may also lead to bad outcomes if the political institution and democracy in a specific country is not strong enough and is therefore overpowered by the social capital groups.

Even though German society was, at the time, a "joining" society these groups were fragmented and their members did not use the skills they learned in their club associations to better their society. They were very introverted in the Weimar Republic. Hitler was able to capitalize on this by uniting these highly bonded groups under the common cause of bringing Germany to the top of world politics. The former world order had been destroyed during World War I, and Hitler believed that Germany had the right and the will to become a dominant global power.

Additionally, in his essay "A Criticism of Putnam's Theory of Social Capital", [] Michael Shindler expands upon Berman's argument that Wiemar social clubs and similar associations in countries that did not develop democracy, were organized in such a way that they fostered a "we" instead of an "I" mentality among their members, by arguing that groups which possess cultures that stress solidarity over individuality, even ones that are "horizontally" structured and which were also common to pre- soviet eastern europe , will not engender democracy if they are politically aligned with non-democratic ideologies.

Later work by Putnam also suggests that social capital, and the associated growth of public trust are inhibited by immigration and rising racial diversity in communities. In societies where immigration is high USA or where ethnic heterogeneity is high Eastern Europe , it was found that citizens lacked in both kinds of social capital and were overall far less trusting of others than members of homogenous communities were found to be.

  • I Was There - December 1941 - U.S. War Correspondents Reporting World War Two?
  • Microsoft SQL Server 2008 Integration Services Unleashed.
  • One Day We’ll Dance Again: A Family’s Journey through Illness and Grief.
  • Lack of homogeneity led to people withdrawing from even their closest groups and relationships, creating an atomized society as opposed to a cohesive community. These findings challenge previous beliefs that exposure to diversity strengthens social capital, either through bridging social gaps between ethnicities or strengthening in-group bonds. It is very important for policy makers to monitor the level of perceived socio-economic threat from immigrants because negative attitudes towards immigrants make integration difficult and affect social capital.

    James Coleman has indicated that social capital eventually led to the creation of human capital for the future generation. Field suggested that such a process could lead to the very inequality social capital attempts to resolve. Even though Coleman never truly addresses Bourdieu in his discussion, this coincides with Bourdieu's argument set forth in Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture. Bourdieu and Coleman were fundamentally different at the theoretical level as Bourdieu believed the actions of individuals were rarely ever conscious, but more so only a result of their habitus see below being enacted within a particular field, but this realization by both seems to undeniably connect their understanding of the more latent aspects of social capital.

    According to Bourdieu, habitus refers to the social context within which a social actor is socialized. Thus, it is the social platform, itself, that equips one with the social reality they become accustomed to. Out of habitus comes field, the manner in which one integrates and displays his or her habitus. To this end, it is the social exchange and interaction between two or more social actors. To illustrate this, we assume that an individual wishes to better his place in society.

    He therefore accumulates social capital by involving himself in a social network, adhering to the norms of that group, allowing him to later access the resources e. If, in the case of education, he uses these resources to better his educational outcomes, thereby enabling him to become socially mobile, he effectively has worked to reiterate and reproduce the stratification of society, as social capital has done little to alleviate the system as a whole.

    This may be one negative aspect of social capital, but seems to be an inevitable one in and of itself, as are all forms of capital. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Civil society Political particularism Positive rights Social capital Value pluralism. Sandel Charles Taylor Michael Walzer. Christian democracy Radical centrism Republicanism Social democracy. Sex differences in social capital. Prospects for a new Concept". Academy of Management Review. Also see Hanifan, L. If self-government in the place is to work, underlying any float of population must be a continuity of people who have forged neighborhood networks.

    These networks are a city's irreplaceable social capital. Whenever the capital is lost, from whatever cause, the income from it disappears, never to return until and unless new capital is slowly and chancily accumulated. American Journal of Sociology. Wellman, Barry and Scot Wortley. Community Ties and Social Support".

    American Journal of Sociology Rethinking social capital in relation with income inequalities". Les Classiques de Science Sociale. Gert and Mills C. Wright eds From Max Weber. The Quest for Community. A Comparative Regional Analysis. Is Civil Society an Adequate Theory? Journal of Planning Education and Research. America's Declining Social Capital". On the contrary, the historical legacy mitigates the negative effect of inequitable income distribution, low labour market participation and weak national cohesion on social capital Ferragina Civic Engagement in America.

    Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University. Retrieved December 2, Effects of inequitable offer, relationship, and relational-self orientation". Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. Retrieved 6 February A meta-analysis of contextual and methodological moderators". Journal of Business Venturing. Explicit use of et al.

    Putnam 7 August The Collapse and Revival of American Community. America's declining social capital" Submitted manuscript. Scales for the social capital in an online era. An International Journal, 5 2 , Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology". Knowledge and Social Capital: Review of Social Economy. Towards a Network-based Conception of Social Resources. The Cornucopia of the Commons] link , yes!

    Encyclopedia of Political Communication. The Subject Investigated , 24 March Bezkresy Wiedzy, , s. Civil Society and Natural Resource Management. Neighborhood sense of community and social capital: Research, applications, and implications pp. The Meanings and Problems of a Theoretical Metaphor?

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. American Political Science Review. A Cross Country Investigation". Quarterly Journal of Economics. Le Radici dell'Italia di Putnam". Racial Diversity and Social Capital: Equality and Community in America. Archived from the original MLA on 21 October Retrieved 6 April The Journal of Socio-Economics. Requiem for a Theory? Social Capital versus Social Theory: The World Bank and Social Capital.

    Dowley and Brian D. Archived from the original on 28 January Equal Participation but Separate Paths?: Building a network theory of social capital. Theory and research, pp. Patterns of Internet use and the production of social capital". Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Social Networking and Social Capital within the Organization. Communications of the ACM. The individual within the collective: Virtual ideology and the realization of collective principles.

    On and Off the Internet. Changes in Adult Friendship Network Size from to ". Do Internet users have more social ties? The strength of internet ties. Changes in core discussion networks over two decades". The Policy Studies Journal. Spatial dynamics of collective efficacy for children". The Toqueville Review, vol. The democratic effect of community gardening". Journal of Leisure Research.

    Archived from the original PDF on 8 December In this publication, Field adopts a social networking centric view of social capital. People will use both formal institutions and entities of various kinds and informal structures to mobilize and apply social capital in enabling positive and constraining negative ways. While social capital is a relatively simply concept, Field concludes that conceptualizations to-date are incomplete, too loose, and even possibly flawed.

    The lack of theoretical maturity concerning social capital suggests that more empirical investigation needs to be done. For instance, how participants mobilize their networks to activate their social capital is one topic Field notes. What can be concluded is that social capital is the property of relationships. Also, social capital delivers no value unless its participants possess the agency to leverage it.

    Membership in networks is key for social capital to form and evolve. Field frames the work of Bourdieu and Coleman in the context of their respective era and context. Bourdieu examined social capital in an era where elites and social hierarchy were dominant. Social capital was a means for rationalizing how people managed to cooperate investing in a future reciprocity rather than an immediate gain.

    It seems that social capital becomes more of a public good and rationalizes collective action, even though individuals are pursuing their own agendas, according to Coleman. Social capital then is more of a by-product of a cooperative pursuit by individuals to further his or her own self-interests.

    In addition to Bourdieu and Coleman, Field points to the work of Robert Putnam and his influence on raising the visibility of social capital. Putnam focuses on the decline of social capital in the U. Putnam also distinguishes between types of social capital: Field also notes that Bourdieu, Coleman, and Putman have not dived deeply enough into the negative aspects of social capital. Field notes the contribution of Pamela Paxton to the thinking around social capital. Field also highlights the contribution of Nan Lin who examines social capital and how participants cooperate and gain reciprocity in the context of strong and weak ties leveraging the work of Granovetter.

    Lin suggests that certain mechanisms help lead to the type of cooperation and reciprocity necessary for social capital to deliver positive benefits e. However, Field notes that cooperation that benefits its participants does not always result in a positive benefit to society which gets back to negative aspects of social capital that can sometimes be a derivative result.

    Indicators of social capital are often proxies that do not directly measure social capital and can mislead as well as inform.